Perspective: An Article on the Latest Allegations Against Michael Jackson

Allegations of anal rape have taken us to another level of bestiality, beyond the accusations of mutual masturbation and plying of alcohol. They’ve upped the ante. They’ve had to. Because those ‘lesser’ allegations were discredited in a court of law during the trial that broke Michael’s heart and ultimately killed him. The maids quoted by Stacy Brown in his recent New York Post article, in which they spoke of their ‘recollections’ of times at Neverland, were dismissed off hand by the 2005 jury as “liars”.

We go again.

The allegations of anal rape have been chosen specifically to leave an indelible smear on the psyche of those that hear them. After such accusations, the most we fans can do in the short-term is mere damage control. In 2003, Michael wisely recorded himself being recorded by Martin Bashir and his team. And, as a riposte to the debacle that was the Living With Michael Jackson documentary, Michael distributed his own version of the interviews entitled ‘Take 2’, in which Bashir’s unethical techniques of sycophancy and bullying, combined with clever editing, were exposed. But the damage had already been done.

The discredited maids’ stories offered the slavering tabloid junkies nothing new. Tabloid tactics that smacked so recognisably of newspapers in 1993. Libellous fabrications plucked from the ether and attributed to ‘a source’. Reading their descriptions was akin to listening to someone detail the character of a mutual friend, a person you had known for decades, but who they have only recently become acquainted with. You know this old friend inside-out – their flaws, their tribulations, their virtues –and are therefore gobsmacked by the inaccuracy of this other person’s depiction of them. Besides, though Michael may well have got drunk and urinated in his porch – as far as compiling a case for sodomising a child is concerned – it doesn’t seem particularly relevant.

No-one is suggesting that there wasn’t something unique about Michael’s relationships with children. But, as I shall reiterate once again: in lieu of any evidence of wrongdoing, a person’s perspective on Michael Jackson is entirely a reflection of what the observer wants to see. My stance is that Michael was both as fragile and magical as an egg; as emotionally charged, yet as carefully crafted as a poem. He was the puppet Pinocchio that eventually realised his dream in becoming a flesh-and-bone human boy.

As children, we were all alchemists. We combined our ingredients of mud, grass and leaves, and with the mix we made cake. This was the magic that inspired Michael. When the mystery of the gravity-defying Smooth Criminal lean was made public by the press, Michael responded by wondering why anyone would want to reveal the mechanics and ruin the magic. His desires to prolong childhood and chase dreams were borne of the same principle. Revered movie director John Ford famously said, “If it’s a choice between the truth and the legendprint the legend.” A sentiment Michael very much agreed with. After all, it was Diana Ross that discovered the Jackson 5, right?

Sony have invested too much in their reinterpretation of Michael Jackson, for it all now to be ‘inconvenienced’. For better or worse, they understand that Michael is an industry unto himself – one that provides an opportunity for decades of profit-procurement – and the likelihood is that Sony will encourage the Estate to settle these latest claims out of court. Sony are extremely powerful, and have form – they misadvised Michael back in 1993, when they recommended he settle then.

Sony may have invested their money in Michael; but we have invested our hearts. We followed him devoutly as he vindicated himself in 2005. We will not allow our decades of stoic support to be undermined by greedy, immoral opportunists. Michael gladly assumed his responsibility as a gatekeeper for innocence. But, noticing that one has responsibilities is the easy part. Engaging with them is an altogether separate matter. It is our responsibility to engage in the defence of our voiceless hero against yet another systematic attempt at his vilification.

Yet, as I say: this is not about angles of perspective. This is about defending a good man – in light of the facts – not of faith.

***

Michael Jackson Anti-Defamation Group ‘Voice As One’ are organising a mass email protest against the serial MJ abuser Stacy Brown, who wrote the aforementioned article for the New York Post. For details, see Facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/groups/voiceasone or follow @voiceasone on Twitter.

Peacock: An Article on Michael Jackson as a Unifier

“In the beginning, the land was pure – even in the early morning light, you could see the beauty in the forms of nature. Soon, men and women of every colour and shape would be here too – and they would find it all-too easy not to see the colours; and to ignore the beauty in each other. But they would never lose sight of the dream of a better world that they could build together – in triumph.”

And so ends the Michael Jackson-penned voiceover, spoken as the camera pans across a gorgeous vista displaying daybreak over a deserted landscape; the ending of which, signals the horns to ignite the iconic rhythm of The Jacksons track, Can You Feel It.

In spite of the short film’s inclusion in a 2001 poll listing the 100 Greatest Music Videos, the spectacle that is the Can You Feel It promo is nowadays often overlooked. However, in 1981, the year of its release, the video’s state-of-the-art visual effects popped the eyes and blew the minds of anyone that watched it, as demonstrated quite clearly by the gasp of disbelief accompanying the introduction of its premiere on American Bandstand. Prior to Can You Feel It, the accepted format of music videos was that of a band in a studio, pretending to sing and perform their instruments in front of a static camera. The conception and execution of the Can You Feel It project was nothing short of revolutionary. It was a vanguard; it was the work of a visionary.

(In a fortnight, Beyonce will be presented with the MTV Michael Jackson Video Vanguard Award: an award named after Michael in 1991, in honour of the culture-altering contribution that was his dedication to utilising the music video as a credible artistic medium. Still, between the years of 1993 and 2005, the award was only intermittently presented. 1997 was one of the years in which it was – when Mark Romanek was granted the prize, after having directed the short film, Scream. However, since Michael was cleared of the child molestation allegations, they have been a frequent feature of the MTV Video Music Awards show. MTV would do well to remember that they would not even exist if it were not for Michael Jackson.)

Upon leaving Motown,The Jacksons created their own production company – Peacock Productions. They explained their choice of name for this venture by saying, “Through the ages, the peacock has been honored and praised for its attractive, illustrious beauty. Of all the bird family, the peacock is the only bird that integrates all colors into one, and displays this radiance of fire only when in love. We, like the peacock, try to integrate all races into one through the love of music.” The peacock feather is utilised in the Can You Feel It video, as an emblem of hope that descends upon humanity, after the light of the sun is extinguished by an eclipse. It’s a truly touching moment.

The significance of a group of black men, products of the decade that brought an end to racial segregation in the United States, wielding their substantial influence cannot be understated. Their message was to encourage progression – that, in spite of their forefathers having suffered the torture and inhumanity of slavery, any ambitions of world peace involve every one of us moving forward, united. Accusations were levelled at The Jacksons that the video was a mass Jehovah’s Witness promotion and recruitment attempt. And that’s cynicism for you. However, a connection does indeed exist between Christianity and peacocks: in the religion’s early incarnation, the peacock was utilised as a totem for immortality. This was due to the fact that after a peacock died, its feathers remained fresh and vibrant, in spite of the decaying flesh beneath.

One of the jackets that Michael wore to perform Jam on the Dangerous Tour (the artwork on the associated album also featuring an image of a peacock), in which he took to the stage to strut and state, reminds me a great deal of the shimmer and sheen of the peacock’s feather. At first glance, both the jacket and the feather are made up of what are ostensibly solid colours; but with closer inspection, it is revealed that they are actually comprised of myriad, minutely varied colours that integrate to appear as one. The same can be said for the many layers that combine to create a song; or the words employed to write a book.

As such, the peacock feather provides us with a perfect metaphor for the political and philosophical leanings of Michael Jackson. It is one that suggests that the growing individualistic nature of the people of the world (Michael himself taking individualism to its ultimate conclusion), in which the shackles of patriarchy are being dismantled (one of the consequences being a new-found freedom to provide one’s child with a name not dictated by cultural expectations – think more Prince, less Peter), need not necessarily be an ominous thing.

So long, of course, that we coalesce: that each of us take pride in our position as a requisite speck of light on the peacock’s coat; that we contribute to its immortality; that we do so – in triumph.

Home: An Article on Relinquishing Michael Jackson’s Neverland

When I was a little boy, I used to imagine that, living in the attic, was one example of every animal that existed on Earth. And on weekday mornings, I would venture up to the attic with the sole purpose of choosing and retrieving an animal to accompany me to school for the day. Typically, I opted for either a tiger, a chimpanzee or an elephant. When I got home, I would return the animal to its menagerie of friends. Said attic was in my childhood home – the place where I spent the most formative fifteen years of my life. To this day, my sleeping dreams – regardless of the context – are most often played out within the walls of that house.

Michael Jackson bought Neverland in 1988, aged thirty years old. He would inhabit it for fifteen years. During which time, it would serve as both his utopia and refuge. It was a place nothing short of outrageous in its pure expression of self and freedom. Truly, Neverland was Michael Jackson’s soul made manifest. Michael was ultimately wrenched from his spiritual home as a result of following advice from a legal team distinctly aware of the ruthlessness of Tom Sneddon, a man with an insatiable and psychotic vendetta.

Each concert of the Bad Tour of 1988-89 ended with the words, “Make that change.”  In 1989, Michael released the Leave Me Alone video, in which he exorcised himself of the materialistic attitude that encapsulated the 1980s (much to his artistic detriment, according to the music critics). Following on from the phenomenon that was the Bad project – in particular, Man In The Mirror – Michael attempted to specifically focus his life and career on humanitarian efforts. Neverland was a custom-made physical construct of this. Michael’s exploitation of the rampant capitalism that defined the eighties made the development of Neverland a fiscal possibility – but once this had been accomplished, Michael transformed his home into something of substance and importance. He elevated Neverland into “a place called Hallowed Ground” – Michael wrote Speechless whilst watching children play there.

Neverland was an oasis of innocence. Like the protagonist in Salvador Dali’s painting “Female Figure with Head of Flowers”, Neverland shone as a beacon of beauty in an otherwise-arid landscape bedevilled by searching, solitude, regret and servitude: both metaphorically-speaking, and physically. The racketeering attempt of 2005 struck at the very core of his philosophy; his mission; his heart. It tore off the flowers and trampled them into the oblivion of the surrounding dust.

The bustling laughter of children gives any place an inherent sense of unbridled joy. The playground that was Neverland became ghostly silent in its grief for those children who fell victim to the demonic personalities infected by “the same disease of lust, gluttony and greed”. The actions of an evilly envious few, hell-bent on monetary gain, were the ones that raped children. Not Michael Jackson. There is a still from the Martin Bashir interview, when Michael and Gavin Arvizo are holding hands, in which Gavin’s head is nonchalantly rested upon Michael’s shoulder. There also exists a more famous, more greatly media-distributed adaptation of this still, in which Gavin’s facial expression is pixelated, and Michael’s face – very obviously and unarguably, when the stills are placed side-by-side – has been digitally manipulated to look sinister. For photoshopped posterity.

Last week, I watched my two young daughters run around the park. They approached people without prejudice, their imploring eyes craving the sating of a question on their minds: “Why is your baby crying?” or “Can you ride a bicycle, too?” They are an unrivalled joy to observe. Yet, there was something in their demeanour that reminded me of the horrors I used to witness on the streets of the Kenyan capital of Nairobi. The thirst for knowledge that I recognised in my children’s faces caused me to recall the look in the eyes of Kenyan children of a similar age – four or five – who pleaded for money from passing strangers: money that would be spent on the drugs to which they had become addicted; drugs that helped them escape the reality of their pitiful lives.

I recently happened upon an interview with Zac Efron. As one does. In it, Zac describes – as a fortuitous consequence of working with Kenny Ortega on the High School Musical movie franchise – how he was given a phone, on which Michael was on the other end. Zac Efron is a lifelong fan of Michael’s, and the unexpected occurrence that was him being on the phone to his idol, resulted in Zac breaking down in uncontrollable tears. Unable to compose himself, Zac handed the phone back to Kenny Ortega, who ended the call. Michael then phoned again and specifically asked to speak to the actor. Michael was also now crying. Through the mutual sobs, Michael managed to utter the words, “See? Dreams do come true.” I believe that Michael was weeping in the piqued hope of believing his own dreams would one day come to fruition; that all his efforts in forging a cultural foundation upon a belief in the wisdom of childhood would one day be realised: that all the sacrifice will have been worth it. After all – and with total respect to the likeable man – I doubt Michael Jackson was plaintive at the realisation of a dream coming true that involved talking to Zac Efron on the phone.

The Estate of Michael Jackson’s belief-defying, inherently inexcusable willingness to allow the sale of Neverland – the physical construct, remember, that inimitably expresses Michael’s soul – must surely provide the Michael Jackson fan community with a cause for unanimous agreement. The sale of Neverland is irrefutably – even to the most die-hard of Estate supporters – glaringly wrong. The preparations for This Is It (a tour Michael was forced to agree to for financial reasons, though at the same time persevering to earnestly dismiss the idea of selling Neverland – or his unpublished music, for that matter) led to his death. The close-up photograph of Michael’s face taken during the They Don’t Care About Us rehearsals – clearly portraying the face of an agonised human being  (yet used to promote the movie’s release, with it ‘being proof’ that Michael was ‘in shape’) – has since been copyrighted – hence, limiting its distribution. ‘This Is It’ was an empty hearse. ‘This Is It’ was an international snuff movie that raked in the dollars

And the last thing organised racists would do after carrying out a lynching? Seize the property of the lynched.

Enough of the rock-throwing, however. Confucius philosophised that, at the point where one faction of a battle appears to be in control, the wisest thing to do is allow the opposition to retreat across their bridge, thus allowing them an opportunity to reconsider their perspective. The Estate-supporting sector of the Michael Jackson fan community have arrived at such a juncture.

In 2003, Michael said, “”I wanted to have a place where I could create everything I never had as a child… I love it. And I will always love it. And I will never, ever sell Neverland. Neverland is me… You know? It represents the totality of who I am. It really does… I love Neverland.” In 2012, a legal spokesperson for Katherine Jackson said, “It is the wish of the beneficiaries that Neverland be kept in the family, and Michael’s children one day decide what to do with their home.” In 2013, Paris Jackson spoke about her wish to return and resurrect her childhood home, Neverland. In four short years, Prince Jackson will gain personal control of his inherited share of his father’s multi-millions. Why can’t the lawyers at the helm of the Estate of Michael Jackson fund the uniquely precious preservation of his historically-significant childhood home until then? The place where Michael’s children grew up not having to imagine retrieving an animal from their attic, as those very real animals lived in their garden? Animals that lived there because Michael Jackson so clearly and inherently understood the idiosyncratic yearnings of youth.

The unparalleled talent and genius of Michael Jackson almost becomes redundant in the face of what he tried to utilise the resulting fame for – an attempt at a legacy that makes the world a better place, beginning with a universal reverence for childhood. Neverland encapsulated this. There is all-round uproar in the Michael Jackson fan community: millions of individuals voicing their incredulity at the idea of Neverland being sold.

So – what to do? I have encountered the inspired idea of using Twitter to encourage those with the means and motive to engage with the cause. The individuals that immediately spring to mind are @JanetJackson and @LisaPresley. It may very well appear to be a naïve approach to some, but we must have faith in our strength in numbers. Besides, naivety, in itself, was such a powerful and defining character trait of our hero. And there is such minimal effort expended in the sending of a tweet.

I am a great believer in hope. I am a great believer in home.

It is where I go in my dreams.

Wings: An Article on Michael Jackson’s Self-Sacrifice

Michael Jackson performed to hundreds of millions of people during his life. Every crowd he played to was comprised of an adoring ocean of people, in which each individual had fallen as a nuanced raindrop, forming a harmonious sea of love: a form that was fluid, yet entire – like the dancer and the dance that had summoned them all to be together. And Michael gleefully received this love. More than that: he was energised by it. Arms outstretched, awash in the pulsing warmth of the love of a hundred-thousand people, he absorbed the adoration the way a butterfly imbues heat – in order to generate enough strength to fly.

Michael would scream to the sound engineers, “Hurt me!” in a request for them to increase the volume and intensity of the music. And indeed there was a sense of the masochist in his work ethic. The global events that were Michael Jackson World Tours caused renewed suffering from his various medical conditions.  The poor state of his lungs – likely a consequence of the merciless schedule thrust upon him that involved nightly singing in the smoky venues the Jackson 5 played (oh the irony of that word!) as child – remained a secret until it was revealed in his autopsy. The clues were there though, what with his increased reliance on lip-synching, yet Michael never let us know the true extent of the damage. The reason Michael grew fatigued of touring was because of the sleeping pills and pain medication he knew he would have to come to rely on to fulfil his mission.

With this borne in mind, then, the efforts exerted in his planetary crisscrossing, as courageous as they would be even for someone in their physical prime, become viewed as being nothing short of superhuman. As his health deteriorated, there became a converse increase in the intensification of his efforts to relay, promote and safeguard his message of peace.

People are extra-performative with those they trust. With their children, especially. Michael had voluntarily adopted the mantle as the father of all the world’s children – both those of a young chronological age, and those adults – the “lost” ones – who are so often the people that remain devoted to his mission. The ones in front of whom he could perform without prejudice. The ones he surrounded himself with. Michael understood that children innately amplify experiences – of fear; of rage; of a Michael Jackson concert; of love. And he lived and breathed this knowledge, along with the responsibility of it as he delivered his message.

Michael’s efforts to maintain his natural character were under perpetual bombardment from those who simply did not possess either the intellectual or emotional capacity to understand him. These attacks – like a storm battering a rock – inevitably, as they would anyone, weathered him. The spray that spat from the media tempest inflicted pain like water torture. Yet regardless, he strived to preserve and express that congenital core of purity.

And this ‘weathering’ is not merely a metaphor – the attacks physically shaped him. It was this bullying that initially motivated the plastic surgery Michael Jackson would ultimately become a poster boy for.  Ironically – though very much in keeping with the idea of the entity Michael Jackson being a microcosm of the entirety of humanity – plastic surgery has now become an accepted daily feature of our postmodern world. As the man himself said, “plastic surgery wasn’t invented for Michael Jackson” – and the sheer hypocrisy of, not only his peers in that Mecca of perceived self-rectification known as Hollywood, but also of any single person that endeavours to artificially alter their appearance to assuage their insecurities: be that breast implantation, teeth-whitening or photoshopped pictures – proves him absolutely right.

Children are oblivious to such superficiality. It is no wonder Michael chose to be around them. Yet, with the befriending of children came a different sadness. The vast majority of these friendships were doomed from the outset to be fleeting. The lyrics detailing the tragedy of the protagonist of the song Puff The Magic Dragon remind me a great deal of Michael – a figure of legend entrapped eternally in a world where friends come and go, as their finite time in the kingdom of childhood comes to an end:

“Dragons live forever but not so little boys,
Painted wings and giant strings make way for other toys…
Without his lifelong friend, Puff could not be brave,
So Puff that mighty dragon sadly slipped into his cave.”

As fans, it is our responsibility to ensure that the sadness he was forced to endure makes sense in the end. That it meant something. Let us not allow the phenomenon that was Michael Jackson be a missed opportunity for an ambassador; an emblem; a paradigm of peace. Who knows when – or if – the world will ever know again anyone so universally recognised, whose sole intention was to help humanity evolve from its ubiquitous acts of bestial violence, and towards universally practiced ideals of peace? Michael encouraged the people of planet Earth to adopt his unprecedented fame and utilise it as a chance for global unity: as a catalyst for the positive progression of the human race. His life was one of self-sacrifice for our entertainment – it being the inimitable tragedy of Shakespearean proportions that it was.

Surely, the fulfilment of Michael Jackson’s wish of him being a totem for love and understanding is not merely one he earnestly deserved, but one the world should be emphatically embracing? Or at least be grateful that he granted us the chance? People underestimate the fact that Michael Jackson was the most famous person on planet Earth. A heavy fact with unimaginable repercussions for the man. One day, people will envy our privilege as having been upon the same planet as a living Michael Jackson: a man that tried to teach that life itself is legacy; a man who endorsed the idea that each human being needs to care deeply about what happens to the next generation, and that this crucial wisdom for humanity’s future must be instilled in people as children. As the little girl’s voice used in Heal The World states, “Think about the generations… they want to make the world a better place – for our children, and our children’s children.”

Prior to Neverland and Michael’s attempt at creating a safe haven for innocence; prior to the Pepsi promo burning incident (occurring on the exact middle day of his life) that introduced him to the ephemeral relief of prescription painkillers; prior to the mass media opprobrium; prior to the child molestation allegations, Michael Jackson was interviewed candidly in the gardens of the Encino family home. The interview was later commercially released, much to his dismay. In said video, dubbed ‘Unauthorised’, Michael is seen crooning at the night sky – astonished, inspired and bewildered by the the beauty of it all. High on nature and his unique connection to its elements, he feels he can fly, and dances as if he’s a bird taking flight. Or, perhaps – a butterfly.

Michael Jackson’s lifelong martyrdom ensured that he earned those wings.

Jew Me: An Article on Michael Jackson’s Alleged Antisemitism

The controversy stirred by Michael Jackson’s use of the words ‘Jew’ and ‘Kike’ in his song They Don’t Care About Us resulted in his being forced by Sony to mask the offending terms. He did this by utilising what was tantamount to a sonic scribbling out; and in the act of making these alterations so very obvious, he managed to explicitly express his distaste at the enforced censorship. Footage emerged shortly afterwards – apparently shot during the sanctioned re-edit – showing a silhouetted Michael Jackson angrily throwing equipment around a recording studio. Ensuing variations of the track – released on later compilations – involved replacing the ‘trashing’ sound with an equally auditory jarring repetition of the lyrically arrhythmic word from the first part of the line – “Kick me, kick me / Don’t you black or white me.” The song is thus forever both scarred and sanctified by this intentional lack of proper rectification. Or – to paraphrase Michael’s adlib at the climax of said track – “it’s there to remind us.”

During the subsequent Diane Sawyer interview, in which was shown the “vainglorious” HIStory promotional video (that borrows heavily from the Nazi propaganda piece, Triumph Of The Will), Michael defended his use of the terms ‘Jew’ and ‘Kike’ with the retort that he was merely utilising the imagery to illustrate the extent to which he himself had become a victim – as in, how the Jewish race were victims when subjugated to the atrocities meted out upon them during the Holocaust. Indeed, the word ‘Kike’ is derived from the hebrew word for ‘circle’ – a derisory term given to Jewish immigrants as a result of their being required to draw a circle instead of a cross in order to mark their identification, upon their arrival in America after escaping the World War II atrocities.

And – certainly – Michael Jackson had also been marked and victimised.

However, he was also the man that wrote the words: “God’s a place for you / Oh, Palestine / I believe in you / Oh, Palestine, I will die for you”. So, as far as being “a victim” is concerned, one cannot ignore Michael’s stance on the criminal violence flaunted by the Jewish nuclear power state of Israel upon the displaced people of Gaza. A situation Michael laments in another HIStory track, Earth Song, with the words: “What about the Holy Land? / Torn apart by creed.”

Michael liked to highlight social injustice – wherever it was, and in whatever form it took. He shone the spotlight on instances of bullying. In fact, almost two decades prior to the furore forged by the deaths and social disharmony resultant of Brazil’s efforts to host the 2014 FIFA World Cup, Michael Jackson’s They Don’t Care About Us video (‘Brazil Version’ – in which he performs both the Black Panther salute and the Nazi goose step), had already strived to focus the world’s attention on the injustice of the wealth divide there: a division starkly illustrated in the opening sequence of the video, as the statue of Christ the Redeemer pans into view – omniscient and omnipotent, as it towers majestically over the ramshackle slums that cower in its shadow. A voice plays over the footage, imploring in Portuguese, “Michael, they don’t care about us.” The location of the actual shoot – the Rio de Janeiro favela, Dona Marte – held historical significance with its having once been slave quarters, where slaves had been publicly flogged. By 1996, it had become a drug baron’s dream. Claudia Silva – the press officer for Rio de Janeiro’s tourist board – later exalted Michael’s positive influence on the area by saying, “This process to make Dona Marta better started with Michael Jackson… There are no drug dealers anymore, and there’s a massive social project. But all the attention started with Michael Jackson.”

Later in the Diane Sawyer interview, Michael went on to say “Some of my best friends are Jewish” – listing Steven Spielberg among them, in spite of their recent falling out over a reneged deal concerning the fledgling Dreamworks venture, and despite Spielberg being the driving force behind the imposed alteration of the words ‘Jew’ and ‘Kike’ (claiming Michael had resurrected the latter term from practical extinction and brought it back into common usage). Yet – as true as Michael’s statement regarding Jewish friends may or may not have been – it’s about as cliched a statement as one can make in any defence against accusations of bigotry. However, it’s worth bearing in mind that Michael’s bonafide advocate Elizabeth Taylor was also Jewish, as is the mother of his two eldest children (as well as her employer: primary Dr. Feelgood, Dr. Klein). Also, Michael begins the song They Don’t Care About Us with the words “Skinhead, dead head” – which is a blatant and direct rebuttal of Neo-Nazism. Other lyrics in the song include the unclear reference to being “In the suite / On the news” – words easily misheard as “Innocent / On the noose”. As part of the Chandler settlement agreement, Michael was prevented from using certain words with which he could directly vindicate himself, so this was his method for overcoming any potential legal backlash. (Michael also used this technique in another HIStory track – the Tom Sneddon diatribe D.S.) Another ostensibly surreal lyric in They Don’t Care About Us is “Everybody dog food.” It’s open to interpretation, of course, but ‘dog’ is another particularly derogatory term used against Jewish people.

Michael namechecks both Martin Luther and Roosevelt in They Don’t Care About Us. The only question is: which of the namesakes is he referencing? The other famous Martin Luther – the one prior to the celebrated black luminary – was a notorious antisemite who authored a book entitled ‘On the Jews and Their Lies’. And – whilst one of the two presidents that carried the surname of Roosevelt is revered as a unifier – the other remains under suspicion as being less than sympathetic towards the Jewish plight. However, this ambiguity is seemingly clarified in the ‘Prison Version’ of the They Don’t Care About Us video (where an incarcerated Michael is portayed as the vulnerable human he was, sweating armpits and all) – in which the images used are of the publicly palatable examples of the Martin Luther and Roosevelt namesakes.

Who can truly know what Michael’s perspective was? As ever, he courted controversy and demanded debate. Still. They Don’t Care About Us is track two on Michael Jackson’s HIStory album. This Time Around is track four. On track four, he incorporates a word with just as contentious connotations: ‘Nigger’.

The media response? Not a squeak.

Prophet: An Article on the Fifth Anniversary of the Death of Michael Jackson

The sun takes twelve days to set after its glorious zenith on Vindication Day. Clouds gradually gather: tinged by the touch of the star’s tragic tiring – exacerbating an increasing anxiety that ultimately succumbs to a bleak and black sadness.

Childhood is a period of utopia perpetually repeated for all time, just by differing people. It is a phase of existence content in its inherent disregard of the differences between people, even that of language. This utopia is what people attempt to recreate through the retrograde reach that is the recreational use of opiate drugs. Michael Jackson included. In the lyrics to Place With No Name, Michael sings about finding what he “can fix”, he discovers a “place where no people have pain” in which “kids are playin’… and no-one’s in fear.” The broken-down car depicted in the song a far cry from the funk vehicle imagined in Speed Demon, in which Michael sings, “Speed Demon, you’re they very same one who said the future’s in your hands, the life you save could be your own.” It is nothing less than a criminal tragedy that Michael Jackson was coerced into such extremes of escapism as opiate abuse, as a consequence of the spiritual pillaging wreaked upon his home and solace, Neverland. This is why I always refer to the 2005 trial as being what ultimately killed him on June 25th, 2009 – five years ago today.

The Estate of Michael Jackson is being sued for their attempted deceit of fans. This is a prime opportunity for the millions of fans seduced by the capitalist mutation offered by the Estate as a replacement idol, to evolve in the same way that Michael did: from the man obsessed with having the world’s biggest selling record, to the man obsessed with building the world’s biggest children’s hospital; from materialism to spiritualism. Our peaceful protest in defending the legacy and name of Michael Jackson is gathering pace. Our numbers are amassing. Recruits are being educated with the knowledge that a life of the magnitude of Michael Jackson’s cannot be frittered away by those motivated by mindless greed and vacuous consumerism. Michael Jackson’s life is an chance for the people of the planet to reflect upon what is actually important for each and every one of us. And I don’t imagine media-driven malice is up there high on that list.

The Arab Spring demonstrates the incredible power to create positive change that lies patiently waiting within postmodern media practices. The bestial vindictiveness that is the predictable backlash from traditional media outlets attempting to nullify these occurrences is something that Michael fought in the face of, every day. Michael was the magnetic musician of the people, who defied expectations thrust upon him by this close-minded media. He challenged them, and in doing so, sacrificed his life. We must make the most of the bittersweet fruits borne of a uniquely oppressed childhood and subsequently misunderstood adulthood. We must undo the damage done by the demonic. We must be brave in outing and ousting the bullies. We owe it to Michael. We owe it to his mission. In the developed world, children have been removed from workhouses and relieved of their yokes, and have been granted rights instead. Michael is a catalyst for this achievable ideal to be made the norm across the entire globe. Michael could see that the time and technology was imminent for the mass utilisation of free information and communication for the doing of good. Michael Jackson was a man worth believing in; Michael Jackson was a visionary; Michael Jackson was a prophet.

And the sun may well have set.

But, today – remember: we glow by the moon.

Vindication Day

There are two themes that frequently recur in this blog, and today they are both particularly pertinent. The first theme, is the idea I promote that with regards Michael Jackson, any paedophilic monster construed – given the absolute absence of any evidence to the contrary – can only be one purposefully selected by an observer actively opting to be ignorant of an indisputable fact: a fact forever petrified into history. The fact that nine years ago today – after a gruelling trial that ultimately killed him – Michael Jackson and his personal ideology were completely vindicated: he was entirely absolved of any wrongdoing concerning illegal behaviour involving children. The second theme – bearing in mind, once again, the vast vacancy of any proof whatsoever of anything untoward ever occurring between Michael Jackson and children – is that Michael Jackson created Neverland solely as a haven for the celebration of childhood; as a retreat for an unhindered exploration of the purity and potential of youth; as somewhere he could escape the societal ‘norms’ thrust – unsolicited – upon us all. ‘Norms’ that consistently attempt to corrupt the concept of love, in any of its given forms.

Michael had the financial freedom to revisit the “lost and found” of his childhood on an unprecedented scale: an eccentricity that was seized upon by a cynical society. Yet, most people ‘infantilise’ themselves to a certain extent – and in the same way Michael noted the hypocrisy of the universal acceptance of Caucasian attempts to change their skin colour to fit in with societal aspirations, it should further be noted how the infantilisation of adults is also done on a mass daily basis for similar reasons. Clothes departments of supermarkets, for example, are stocked to the brim with adult nightwear adorned with images of Disney characters: a chance for people to buy into rose-tinted nostalgia, in an attempt to temporarily export themselves back to a time and place where they possessed a kingdom of imagination in which they often sought refuge. The commodification and sexualisation of nostalgia is the cynical prostitution of beautiful efforts borne by the fundamental innocence of humanity. (Nostalgia is big business – just ask the Estate.)

Michael fell victim to his naivety of the perception of his philosophies by the outside world. Michael fingered jealousy as a premium motivational reason for acts of ‘evil’. And – indeed – one may very well argue that the very existence of the mass misunderstanding of Michael’s ideology, is one motivated by a deep-seated envy of his precious capacity for being able to see through the eyes of a child; and of his capability to harness this gift for his art and success. Or perhaps – as demonstrated by those in charge at AEG Live during their ultimately lethal whipping of Michael to perform for This Is It – it is that when a majority are hell-bent on getting what they desire, mass psychopathy ensues – and Lord help anyone standing in their way. The global media opprobrium heaped upon Michael during and since the molestation allegations is further testament to this phenomenon. Bringing Michael Jackson down sold newspapers – and to hell with the effect such treacherous slander might have on such a sensitive soul.

Love is so easily plundered by cynics. There are even certain parts of the USA, where one may openly carry a firearm, yet are denied the option of purchasing a sex toy without possessing a medical prescription – it is the pathologisation and legislation of the simple and most natural act of making love, whilst the promotion of indifference to potential grievous violence continues unchecked. Michael strived to convey a message of anti-violence. He was the Martin Luther King of his generation. He utilised his prominent position on the public pedestal to try and educate against the use of violence, including during acts of protest. After 1993, Michael was placed in, what – for most people – would have been an impossible professional and personal position to return from. Michael responded to this attempted character assassination of him by releasing a song pleading with the people of the Earth to awaken to the damage being done to their planet – a song in which the accompanying short film shows the detonation of an apocalyptic bomb as a little girl runs for her bicycle. This is the evil that Michael wanted to address – by ensuring that all children were given the ironclad right to a childhood free from abuse, and thus in time ending the cycle. It is the next step in the civilisation of humankind, and history will hold Michael Jackson aloft as an evolutionary visionary.

Michael’s stance on the wisdom of children is often lazily dismissed. Perhaps because people find it too vague to understand. In truth, however, it is very specific and very simple. By being ‘like the children’, Michael was suggesting we learn from their innate obliviousness to traits such as race, class or gender: that traits trained into people as they become older, embittered and prejudiced, are non-existent in children. Children simply request that their innate love for everything is reciprocated. This is how Michael was like the children. His physicality embodied the differing traits, whilst his philosophy merely asked that the boundless love he possessed for all the people of the planet be reflected back upon him. And he wanted that for everyone.

Today is Vindication Day. It is perhaps the most significant day in the Michael Jackson calendar. Enjoy!

The Mirror In The Man: An Article On What Michael Jackson Means To You

Following the Brits ‘96 performance of Earth Song, fellow humanitarian Sir Bob Geldof introduced Michael Jackson to the stage, so that he could receive the “one-off: like the man himself” award, Artist of a Generation (“…what generation? At least three have been listening to him already”). He used these words:

“…the most famous person on the planet, God help him… When Michael Jackson sings it is with the voice of angels. And when his feet move, you can see God dancing…”

The ubiquity and intensity of the embarrassingly obvious efforts of the Estate of Michael Jackson to metamorphose him into a throwaway caricature, was recently again on display in the form of the homogenised digital puppet programmed to perform at this year’s Billboard Awards. To create this, they utilised the services of a painfully subpar impersonator; and thusly, continued to evidence a flagrant arrogance in possessing not one remote qualm about artificially replicating the God-bestowed talent of a bona fide legend. All – naturally – as part of a cynical and superficial quest to achieve optimal financial gain. Sam Phillips – owner of Elvis’ first record label, Sun Records – famously said, “…if I could find a white boy who could sing like a black man I’d make a million dollars.” This appears to be the prevailing mantra of the Estate of Michael Jackson, who are apparently intending to take the hologram – the ‘face’ of which is remarkably reminiscent of the one used in the ‘Immortal’ artwork – on tour. Screw truth, ethics, morality and principle.

In 2006, Access Hollywood conducted Michael’s last televised interview. It was undertaken in Ireland during the nomadic period enforced as a result of the 2005 trial and the destruction of his home, Neverland. During this interview, Michael demonstrates his typical humility, but also remarks on his fastidious attention to detail regarding his music: how he puts each sound under “the microscope.” There is a YouTube montage which demonstrates Michael’s remarkable capacity for beatboxing: how he could effortlessly synthesise breath and pulse into a sublime musical experience. Michael was a genius. He was not a puppet.There is also a point further on in the Access Hollywood segment, in which the interviewer infers that Justin Timberlake is the contemporaneous popular musical artist most responsible for continuing his legacy. Michael quickly retorts that we shouldn’t forget to include the black artist, Usher, on the list. Michael was an activist. He was not a puppet.

The turbulence and brutality of the world and its media empires that were prejudiced against him, meant Neverland was the place where Michael sought refuge. Though this is not to say that Michael shied away from conflict – he certainly possessed the courage to confront (there is even a version of the song Money in which Michael calls out press emperor Rupert Murdoch). So much so, that due to his being perceived as a threat, they crucified him: something Michael alludes to in the song, Tabloid Junkie. Michael’s dream was to “turn swords into ploughshares” – a concept as old as time, yet perpetually dismissed by greedy and fearful governments across the globe.

In response to the attempt to have his freedom taken from him, Michael chose the recently Communist countries of Eastern Europe as a prominent theme for the HIStory campaign. He opted to promote freedom through the portrayal of his stark individualism – in countries entrenched in the active homogenisation of its people by their governments. With the inherent irony being Michael’s unique physical appearance as an homogenisation of so many cultural differences. Michael implored us to “harmonise all around the world”. His philosophy for a successful society appeared to be one that is celebratory of each person’s individuality, with the goal of each individual being the potentiation of their fellow human being: the acceptance of the unbridled freedom of each individual as a bedrock for the knitting of a society: that, in the mirror of each individual, society finds its reflection. Michael was a revolutionary. He was not a puppet.

What do we want Michael’s fame to become? What is our responsibility as fans? As human beings? Is it to mindlessly promote the current Estate’s trend of him as a money-making vacuity? Or is it to enrich his reputation and memory through the promulgation of him as a politically-conscious, peace-loving leader? One whose mission was prematurely terminated by the very same nefarious ideals motivating the people now making millions off his name? Do we want to see him immortalised as a caricature of twentieth century pop culture and capitalism? Or as a talisman for peace, hope and mutual acceptance? In short: do we want him cartoonified or beatified?

The actions of the Estate of Michael Jackson force the hands of those of us that care for the true legacy of our hero. We must counterbalance with equal might. As much as they cartoonify Michael, our reaction must be to further exalt him: that with their every insistence on insulting, they are merely fortifying his martyrdom. Michael was a totem; a conduit for the divine. He understood sacrifice as aspirational. He willingly sacrificed himself. Not only did he tour the planet a sick man, rescuing his reputation from slanderous smears whilst simultaneously promoting his message of peace; not only did he later die attempting to do the same thing; but throughout his adult life he used the abyss of self left by a pillaged childhood to construct a mirror for humanity.He gave us the opportunity to reflect upon him: he was the mirror in the man.

Now. Who do you see? I see God dancing.

For Nearly Thirty Years: An Article On Michael Jackson’s Closest Confidante (And Why Her Opinion Matters)

He knew her intimately for nearly thirty years. During this time, she was his confidante, his protector, and his advisor. She rubbed cream into the piebald patchwork that was his back and shoulders: a torso that no-one else got to view, unless she had applied concealing make-up beforehand. He was very insecure about his vitiligo. He was very insecure about his overall physique. During times of stress, he would often fast to feel better about himself – often miss meals, try to concentrate instead on making his work as perfect as possible. Fasting and exhaustion landed him in hospital on numerous occasions. Stress exacerbates the effects of vitiligo. She tried to ensure he was fed.

His face was pocked with acne scars. He believed his nostrils were vast, his chin not clearly defined – that it seemed to get swallowed up by his neck. He was self-conscious about his smile. But he liked his eyes. He would ask her to accentuate them. He had his eyebrows tattooed on. And his lipstick. It saved a lot of time. And meant that when she wasn’t around, they remained there – indelible swooshes of self-esteem reassuring him from the mirror. A lifetime in the public eye had taken its toll. The camera was his nemesis. He would wear a surgical mask, or hide behind strategically straggled curls and a fedora – unless she had primed his confidence first. She did this by combining her artistic skill with a unique, nuanced knowledge of the intricacies of his face, as well as an inimitable understanding how he liked to look – though she also knew that he was capricious in these matters. Such is the nature of insecurity. He was changeable in his choice of hairstyle – sometimes preferring more curls or body in his hair, which gave him a sense of having his face covered, like the surgical mask he often opted to wear. She created and fixed his wigs for him. For nearly thirty years.

Still. Since they had known each other for nearly a third of a century, she would have usually intuited his mood before he had even sat down in the chair. The chair in which they talked. The chair in which they cried together; laughed together. The chair in which they would put the world to rights. For nearly thirty years. Some are jealous of the intimacy they shared. After all, their relationship was simultaneously both as open and close as any can be. She knew and understood his secrets, his intentions, his vices, his desires.

He trusted her. Implicitly. She prepared him for his final corporeal resting place. His deathbed.

He was Michael Jackson. And she was Karen Faye.

The Mission: An Article on Michael Jackson and Children

Children were simultaneously Michael Jackson’s Achilles’ Heel and his vitality. His single-mindedness in being their advocate was his only vulnerability; a pressure point that was exploited with aplomb. His response to the extortion attempt of 1993 was the HIStory album. The dedication on the record’s reverse is given to all the children of the world, who he claims responsibility for. Michael Jackson loved all children the way any mother loves their own.

Sometimes I sit down in crowded areas and imagine what the world is like from the perspective of a child; ponder how frightening and vulnerable children must sometimes feel when confronted with the bustle of a busy street as they’re surrounded by strangers two or three times their own size, whilst also marvelling at how brave they are for engaging with this alien world, regardless. It is courage generated by the same miraculous naivety that makes a child oblivious to their muddied clothes, in spite of their maddened mother – because dirty linen simply pales in pathetic comparison when compared to the majesty of a mud pie. Michael’s physical embodiment of universality not only traversed the boundaries of race and gender, but also of age.

During I’ll Be There, over decades of performing it live, Michael Jackson was the man that cried nightly tears in front of millions and millions of people – tears pricked, he admitted, as a consequence of being overwhelmed by the plight of suffering children. He was the man who, in an opiate oblivion towards the end of his life, remained adamant in his intention to build a children’s hospital. He was the man who instigated the Heal The Kids initiative, and during a promotional speech at Oxford University for the cause, said the words, “The beginning of human consciousness must be that each and every one of us is an object of love.” He was the man that after seeing starving children on television, wrote Be Not Always, with its lyrics, “Faces – did you see their faces? / Did they touch you? / Have you felt such pain?” Before organising, writing and recording the biggest selling charity single of all time in an effort to fund aid for them. He was the man that dedicated his Bad Tour Yokohama performance of I Just Can’t Stop Loving You to the murdered boy, Yoshiaki Hagiwara.

Michael Jackson’s self-imposed exile in Neverland was due to the sense of incongruity he felt with the cynicism of the adult world. As Michael said, with utmost sincerity, he was “Peter Pan in his heart.” ‘Tarantism’ is the word given to describe the act of banishing melancholy by dancing, and it was the safe-haven of Neverland that provided Michael with the requisite solitude and privacy to “escape the world” and “enjoy that simple dance.” Before its being ransacked in 2005. Whereupon, Michael Jackson’s utopian pocket of eternal youth was irreparably corrupted by the monstrous ugliness of a perverted and retarded outside world.

The riposte that was the HIStory project was an uncharacteristically angry sting from Michael. But along with the sense of catharsis that it must have brought him – like a normally peaceable bee stinging out of terror – it also commenced the process of ripping out his heart. The eventual trial of 2005 tore it out completely.

When Scream, the first single from HIStory was released, critical commentators asked how the ordinary person could relate to the song, considering the uniqueness of the subject matter that had been its inception. The response was that the refrain, “Stop pressurin’ me” could be interpreted and extrapolated by listeners to be made relevant to their general frustrations of everyday life. The same applies to what was the single’s accompanying Double A-side track, Childhood – which can be personally engaged with by anyone that feels the need to implore others to attempt to understand them, by asking them to simply look at the injustices they suffered during their childhood. The Double A-side singles of Scream and Childhood were indeed two sides of the same coin. This theme of people recouping their stolen childhoods was returned to on the Invincible track, The Lost Children.

The ecstasy Michael experiences during the Wembley Bad Tour performance of I Just Can’t Stop Loving You, as the crowd sings those very words to him, is starkly evident. The Bad album was conceived as a stadium record, with the songs intended to be brought to life on stages across the world. And it’s no coincidence that Michael hands over the microphone to the audience for part of the chorus in I Just Can’t Stop Loving You. Michael needed to feel our love. He needs that love now more than ever.

Whilst unconscious under the effects of Propofol, no dreaming occurs. It is a tragic irony that Michael Jackson – a man motivated by the power of dreams and ambition – ultimately became the only human being to have ever gone sixty days without actually dreaming. And, just as a murder of media crows circled our martyred Michael whilst he lay on his deathbed in hospital, so they continue to do so now – perched like vultures around their tabloid junkyard, perpetually alert to the possibility of picking at any scraps thrown from a carcass being ravaged by opportunists like Wade Robson and Jimmy Safechuck – to whom it has suddenly occurred that the work has dried up and financing the upbringing of their own children is going to be expensive. And now that Michael is dead, after decades of having only praise for the man, they feel no shame in cashing in on their friendship with him, regardless of whatever nefarious means they must employ. Whilst in the process, putting Michael’s children through hell. Each and every one of us.

Perception is a reflection. And in the absence of one shred; one atom; one iota of evidence; in spite of the rape of Neverland; in consideration of the unanimous affirmation of his innocence by a jury – there is not a sole reason to suspect Michael Jackson as being anything other than a naive and lonely man taken advantage of by greed. Unless, that is what you perversely choose to believe. Since Michael’s death, to quote St.Teresa of Avila, “Yours are the eyes with which he looks with compassion on this world”.

Michael Jackson refused to change direction with his belief in the wisdom of children. We must remain just as unwavering in our defence of him. We must remain stoic and steadfast in the fulfilling of his mission.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,006 other followers